Post by acp on Jul 23, 2021 18:30:44 GMT
Posting topics here so I remember them tomorrow.
- Project timeframe - posted first week of march, game released 2nd week of july - 18 weeks
- resources - weekly meetings between 2-5 hours usually 3-4, my dev time averaged to less than 2 hours a week, at most 5 hours for a couple of weeks
- project results - discussion
- what went well
collaboration/communication
division of labor
tool knowledge
didnt clobber each other's changes
enemy AI
division of labor
tool knowledge
didnt clobber each other's changes
enemy AI
- what could have gone better
initial planning!! (we didn't)
requiring "smart" ai opponents was probably more work than we should have taken on for the first project
requiring "smart" ai opponents was probably more work than we should have taken on for the first project
better engagement with other prospective team members
comms fragmented until we were down to 2 devs
acp - needs to learn git
need to figure out more reliable playtesting
better parameterized gameplay properties for easier internal testing to find "sweet spots"
someone who knows art and design would be nice
going 2.5d ended up not being a great idea
learn more about game promotion and distribution
need analytics - for both user tracking and gameplay intelligence
comms fragmented until we were down to 2 devs
acp - needs to learn git
need to figure out more reliable playtesting
better parameterized gameplay properties for easier internal testing to find "sweet spots"
someone who knows art and design would be nice
going 2.5d ended up not being a great idea
learn more about game promotion and distribution
need analytics - for both user tracking and gameplay intelligence